Measure targets Catch-22 mess
over course required by inmates
Web-posted May 31, 2005
The Michigan Legislature soon will
have a chance to do good and save money at the same time.
Advertisement
It sounds like a can't-miss
proposition, doesn't it?
But the problem and the proposed solution have been around for
most of a decade, with no action.
Now, Sen. Michael Bishop, a Rochester Republican, plans to
introduce a bill that would do the trick.
As it is, many state prison inmates sit behind bars when the only
thing between them and freedom is taking a course that isn't
available to them.
You're right. That makes no sense.
And Bishop says simple administrative changes his bill would
enable should result in the savings of $17 million. In addition, it
would ease crowding pressures in the prison system.
Besides, the Catch-22 of being punished for not doing something
they can't do must make prisoners more disillusioned and cynical
than they already were.
Those affected are guilty of an assaultive crime. By law, they
must complete a treatment program for their bad habits before they
can be released - even if their release or parole eligibility dates
have long since passed.
If it were their fault they hadn't met the requirement, fine.
But the estimate is that, this year alone, nearly 1,500 inmates
will have their releases delayed anywhere from six to eight months
because they can't show that they've completed the course.
In another bureaucratic absurdity, prisoners nearing release who
need the course typically are put in prisons where it is not
available.
Another 1,500 prisoners who completed the course still were
denied parole.
To try to fix that, Bishop's bill would mandate a further review
when a parole board denies release to those who have, in fact, taken
the course. The idea of offering it is, of course, to reduce the
chance of an assaultive offense.
It goes on and on.
Prisoners who are held under extra security aren't offered the
course and are released anyway, without having taken it.
You may have noticed that makes even less sense than the rest of
this mess.
In the real world, we wouldn't have to pass a law to get this
done, but Bishop's would require that prison officials keep track of
who needs the therapeutic course and make sure it's available to
them on a timely basis, so they don't spend extra time behind bars
on our nickel, time the judge didn't even sentence them to.
In an attempt to head off all possible absurdities, the bill also
would prevent a gratuitous denial of parole on the grounds that an
enrolled prisoner had not completed the course at the time of his or
her normal parole eligibility date. Such completion would then be
required after parole.
Lawmakers can be forgiven for failing to anticipate the
perversity of the prison system when they made the course a
requirement.
Bishop's bill would attempt to correct that by telling those who
run it every move to make.
But it's hard to legislate brains.
The citizenry will owe the Lansing-based Citizens Alliance for
Prisons and Public Spending and the American Friends Services
Committee, Criminal Justice Program, for pushing this strange issue
onto the legislative stage.
The alliance stresses that "policy choices, not public safety"
are the reason for our huge and costly prison population.