Gongwer News Update 2-6-07

 

GRANHOLM TO COMMUTE SENTENCES FOR INFIRM, ALIENS

 

Part of the effort of reducing the state’s budget is reducing the number of people it houses in prisons.  Governor Jennifer Granholm is expected to propose Tuesday doing that in part by releasing those whose medical condition or age makes them unlikely to be a danger to society, as well as those who are not likely to remain in the country long enough to be a danger.

 

In her State of the State address, Ms. Granholm is expected to announce a change in her commutation policy, which today has released few prisoners, to make it more amenable to releasing those causing a drain on the state’s budget.

 

The primary target of this new policy will be the most severely ill prisoners.  “The 300 most medically fragile people in the system cost the taxpayers over $30 million a year,” said Corrections spokesperson Russ Marlan.  And he said the most ill person cost the state $1 million last fiscal year.

 

The question that has apparently not been answered in the equation is who would then pay for the care of the commuted prisoners once they are released.  But Mr. Marlan said in part that is because review of the particular circumstances of each prisoner has not been completed.

 

“What we have is an idea where we’re going to go on this,” he said.

 

“Certainly it is not our intention to have these older fragile prisoner become part of the uninsured,” said Granholm press secretary Liz Boyd.  She said in many cases, the prisoners would be eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid, but she said the administration had not yet worked out the criteria for deciding who would be released.

 

“We don’t get Medicaid funds,” Mr. Marlan said of the department.  “Their health care is paid 100 percent by general fund.”

 

And he noted that some prisoners have private health insurance that would cover them once they are released.  Most policies, he said, have a provision that suspends coverage while a person is incarcerated.

 

The department is also working with the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service to determine which prisoners might be eligible to be deported immediately upon release. 

 

“We’re doing what we can to work with Immigration,” Mr. Marlan said.  “Some of these people, barring commutation, may be serving 3 to 4 to 5 to 6 years more.  The commutation may move up deportation.”

 

The proposal marks a reversal for the department, which had in April rejected its role in substantially reducing prison populations and argued it could potentially put criminals on the street.

 

Mr. Marlan said at the time (See Gongwer Michigan Report, April 27, 2006) that in many cases such prisoners are released on bond during the appeals of their deportation orders because of lack of space in federal prisons.

 

“There very few cases where they can say this is a done deal,” he said at the time of deportation orders.   “They have appeal rights on those deportation orders.   So while in theory one would think that's what happens but it (deportation) doesn’t always happen.”

 

But Mr. Marlan said the department is also again pushing for changes in sentencing guidelines that would cut back the prison population.  “There’s been no review of those since ’98,” Mr. Marlan said of the guidelines.  “We’re seeing a lot more people sent to prison than what was anticipated when those were designed.”

 

He said that increased incarceration rate, paired with the current budget crisis, could create the political will to make sentencing changes that has been lacking from legislative leadership in past sessions.

 

Granholm press secretary Liz Boyd said the effort also would include more funding for the prisoner re-entry program.  She said the pilot of that program showed a 21 percent decrease in recidivism over parolees not involved in the program.

 

“What we’re looking at really is a proposal that will allow us to safely reduce the prison population and put us in line with our Midwestern neighbors, at the same time not compromising public safety,” Ms. Boyd said.

 

Both noted that Michigan has a greater prison population than Illinois, Pennsylvania and Ohio despite having a smaller overall population and similar crime rates.

 

Rep. Alma Wheeler Smith (D-Ypsilanti), chair of the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Corrections, said releasing prisoners who are chronically ill and elderly is “long overdue.”

 

“We save a lot on healthcare issues but it’s important they are eligible for Medicaid or Medicare,” as they reenter society, Ms. Wheeler Smith said.

 

In terms of releasing non-violent drug offenders, she said that over the past 15 years lawmakers have been tough on crime but they haven’t been smart on crime in that misdemeanors for drug-related offenses were turned into felonies that eventually had stricter sentencing guidelines attached to them.

 

Ms. Wheeler Smith said the state’s population is no more criminal than those of neighboring states that release those low-risk prisoners at a faster rate than Michigan because of the strict limits placed on the parole board.

 

“In terms of public policy I think we have been our own worst enemy,” she said, adding that besides the release of such prisoners, she also supports reform to the state’s sentencing guidelines, which are being discussed by the House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday.

 

Matt Resch, spokesperson for House Minority Leader Craig DeRoche (R-Novi), said the administration has to be clear on who these prisoners are who are being released so that public safety is not at risk.  When the issue has been brought up in the past and prisoners’ histories were taken into account, sometimes the non-violent drug offenders were not so non-violent, Mr. Resch said.

 

“That’s what has snagged this proposal in the past,” he said.  “We have to see more details.”